VOCA

An aviation researcher, writer, aviation participant, pilot & agricultural researcher. Author of over 35 scientific publications world wide.

Categories

Good reads

Oil Prices

#ozaviation

History – FAA Audit of CASA in 2008

FAA Audit of CASA in 2008 – Not good news for CASA.

 

Old 31st Aug 2011, 03:40   #1 (permalink)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 5,620
FAA Views On CASA – Via Wikileaks

Well well.

The FAA has some reservations about CASA.

A downgrade to “Category 2” was on the cards, which would have meant termination of the Qantas code share deal with American Airlines.

Quote:
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 CANBERRA 001081SENSITIVE
SIPDISDEPARTMENT FOR EAP/ANP, EEB/TRA/OTP (JONATHAN WEBSTER),
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (ELIE NASR, INTERNATIONAL
TECHNICAL SUPPORT BRANCH/FLIGHT STANDARDS SERVICE)E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/07/2019
TAGS: EAIR AS
SUBJECT: AUSTRALIA: FAA COMPLETES ASSESSMENT, NEXT STEPS

REF: A. STATE 119313
¶B. CANBERRA 1040

Classified By: Political-Economic Counselor Edgard Kagan, Reasons 1.4 (
b)(d).

¶1. (C/NF) Summary: The FAA team concluded their audit
(reftels) and gave a brief assessment of preliminary
findings. While the team recognized improvements on previous
shortcomings and commended many areas, a few
problems remain. Australian officials seem committed to
overcoming the shortcomings before a second and final FAA
visit within the next three months, but the possibility of a
category downgrade does exist and is being taken
seriously. The team outlined the sequence of events going
forward and agreed to work closely with Embassy Canberra.
End Summary.

¶2. (C/NF) The FAA team gave a preliminary assessment of
their November 30 – December 4 audit to Australian Civil
Aviation and Safety Authority (CASA) officials and separately
to DCM Dan Clune. The team explained the
significant shortcomings, discussed potential scenarios,
outlined the sequence of events going forward and agreed to
work closely with Embassy Canberra.

Problem:
——–

¶3. (C/NF) While the team recognized improvements on previous
shortcomings and commended many areas, there
remain a few shortcomings, principally a shortage of
properly-trained inspectors and excessive delegation of
regulatory functions to carriers.

Approximate Timeline:
———————

¶4. (C/NF) Based on our conversations with FAA team members,
following is a rough sequence of events going forward:

— Two weeks: Informal letter FAA team to CASA (through
State/Embassy Canberra) delineating specific areas from
their assessment that need to be addressed. This is meant to
aid CASA to swiftly focus efforts on overcoming
shortcomings.

— 30 days: Formal State front-channel cable with official
report of the week-long assessment, constituting official
notification from FAA to CASA under ICAO. According to the
FAA team, this cable will most likely state that Australia
does not/not comply with ICAO standards and indicate that, if
the problems are not remedied, it would be downgraded to
Category 2. The cable will also request further
consultations, which would include a second visit to
Australia within 65 days after the first visit.

— 65-90 days: Second visit to Australia, probably by the
end of February 2010, by a smaller team. This would be a
shorter verification trip which would determine whether or
not to recommend a downgrade to Category 2.

— Mid-March 2010: Approximate timeframe when FAA would
publish official notice of a Category 2 downgrade, in the
event this were to happen.

Preventing Worst-Case Scenario
——————————-

¶5. (C/NF) A downgrade to Category 2 would be the worst-case
scenario, which would entail measures such as
freezing Australia-U.S. flight operations to current levels
and terminating code-sharing arrangements, such as the one
between Qantas and American Airlines. CASA officials are not
taking this possibility lightly and seem committed to
resolve the shortcomings in order to avoid a downgrade.

¶6. (C/NF) Comment: FAA team members were extremely satisfied
with CASA officials’ openness and eagerness to
make constructive improvements based on the assessment. FAA
Qmake constructive improvements based on the assessment. FAA
and CASA clearly have a good working relationship and
we will monitor progress toward maintaining Category 1
status. We will also monitor that CASA’s efforts enjoy
adequate support at the ministerial level as well as from …

Cable Viewer


Last edited by Sunfish; 31st Aug 2011 at 03:54.

Sunfish is offline Report Post

__________________________________________________________________________________________

FAA ICAO Audit Cable 7th December 2009
Cable reference id: #09CANBERRA1081
“All of them, those in power, and those who want the power, would pamper us, if we agreed to overlook their crookedness by wilfully restricting our activities.” — “Refus Global“, Paul-Émile Borduas
Main • Full-text search • Private cart • Browse tags • Overview • History • Media • Crowdsource Central • Manning’s alleged chat logs diff • Donate
Reference id aka Wikileaks id #238347 ?
Subject Australia: Faa Completes Assessment, Next Steps
Origin Embassy Canberra (Australia)
Cable time Mon, 7 Dec 2009 05:33 UTC
Classification CONFIDENTIAL
Source http://wikileaks.org/cable/2009/12/09CANBERRA1081.html
References 09CANBERRA1040
History

Time unknown: Original unredacted version, leaked to Wikileaks
Mon, 29 Aug 2011 03:38: First publication, unredacted, however non-text content differs
Thu, 1 Sep 2011 23:24: Original unredacted version published, with HTML goodies

Extras ? Comments, 1 media item
VZCZCXRO8987 RR RUEHPT DE RUEHBY #1081/01 3410533 ZNY CCCCC ZZH R 070533Z DEC 09 FM AMEMBASSY CANBERRA TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2400 INFO RUEHBN/AMCONSUL MELBOURNE 6824 RUEHPT/AMCONSUL PERTH 5089 RUEHDN/AMCONSUL SYDNEY 5094 RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC
Hide header C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 CANBERRA 001081 SENSITIVE SIPDIS DEPARTMENT FOR EAP/ANP, EEB/TRA/OTP (JONATHAN WEBSTER), FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (ELIE NASR, INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL SUPPORT BRANCH/FLIGHT STANDARDS SERVICE) E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/07/2019 TAGS: EAIR [Civil Aviation], AS [Australia; Ashmore and Cartier Islands; Lord Howe Island; Macquarie Island; Tasmania] SUBJECT: AUSTRALIA: FAA COMPLETES ASSESSMENT, NEXT STEPS REF: A. STATE 119313 B. CANBERRA 1040 Classified By: Political-Economic Counselor Edgard Kagan, Reasons 1.4 ( b)(d). 1. (C/NF) Summary: The FAA team concluded their audit (reftels) and gave a brief assessment of preliminary findings. While the team recognized improvements on previous shortcomings and commended many areas, a few problems remain. Australian officials seem committed to overcoming the shortcomings before a second and final FAA visit within the next three months, but the possibility of a category downgrade does exist and is being taken seriously. The team outlined the sequence of events going forward and agreed to work closely with Embassy Canberra. End Summary. 2. (C/NF) The FAA team gave a preliminary assessment of their November 30 – December 4 audit to Australian Civil Aviation and Safety Authority (CASA) officials and separately to DCM Dan Clune. The team explained the significant shortcomings, discussed potential scenarios, outlined the sequence of events going forward and agreed to work closely with Embassy Canberra. Problem: ——– 3. (C/NF) While the team recognized improvements on previous shortcomings and commended many areas, there remain a few shortcomings, principally a shortage of properly-trained inspectors and excessive delegation of regulatory functions to carriers. Approximate Timeline: ——————— 4. (C/NF) Based on our conversations with FAA team members, following is a rough sequence of events going forward: — Two weeks: Informal letter FAA team to CASA (through State/Embassy Canberra) delineating specific areas from their assessment that need to be addressed. This is meant to aid CASA to swiftly focus efforts on overcoming shortcomings. — 30 days: Formal State front-channel cable with official report of the week-long assessment, constituting official notification from FAA to CASA under ICAO. According to the FAA team, this cable will most likely state that Australia does not/not comply with ICAO standards and indicate that, if the problems are not remedied, it would be downgraded to Category 2. The cable will also request further consultations, which would include a second visit to Australia within 65 days after the first visit. — 65-90 days: Second visit to Australia, probably by the end of February 2010, by a smaller team. This would be a shorter verification trip which would determine whether or not to recommend a downgrade to Category 2. — Mid-March 2010: Approximate timeframe when FAA would publish official notice of a Category 2 downgrade, in the event this were to happen. Preventing Worst-Case Scenario ——————————- 5. (C/NF) A downgrade to Category 2 would be the worst-case scenario, which would entail measures such as freezing Australia-U.S. flight operations to current levels and terminating code-sharing arrangements, such as the one between Qantas and American Airlines. CASA officials are not taking this possibility lightly and seem committed to resolve the shortcomings in order to avoid a downgrade. 6. (C/NF) Comment: FAA team members were extremely satisfied with CASA officials’ openness and eagerness to make constructive improvements based on the assessment. FAA Qmake constructive improvements based on the assessment. FAA and CASA clearly have a good working relationship and we will monitor progress toward maintaining Category 1 status. We will also monitor that CASA’s efforts enjoy adequate support at the ministerial level as well as from CANBERRA 00001081 002 OF 002 Australia’s commercial airlines. BLEICH
Media

Wikileaks: Australia failed US FAA air safety audit in 2009 | Plane Talking
Add media item for this cable…

Comments

Do not load Disqus comments widget (Disqus loads and executes third-party Javascript files, which might be deemed undesirable. Setting will take effect next time a page is loaded.)

User-supplied contents reflect the views of their respective authors, and not necessarily the views of the owner and/or moderator(s) of this web site. Posts with embedded links will have to be approved by a moderator. Only links to external web pages which appear to contribute complementary information to specifics in the cable will be allowed. Links to external web pages should not be construed as a statement of support of the external web sites by the owner and/or moderator(s) of cablegatesearch.net.

 

 

4 comments to History – FAA Audit of CASA in 2008